Everyone talks about sustainability in fashion. But when someone is standing in a store deciding between a $20 t-shirt and a $60 one that claims to be "absurdly soft" and environmentally responsible, what actually tips the scale? I ran a study with six American men to find out what makes them believe, or doubt, premium casual wear claims.
The findings challenged some conventional marketing wisdom. Comfort matters more than sustainability. And sustainability claims without proof are worse than no claims at all.
The Participants
Six male participants from across the United States: a project coordinator in Savannah, an unemployed professional in New York City, a project manager in rural North Carolina, a portfolio manager in rural Texas, a maintenance technician in rural Ohio, and a field service technician in Los Angeles. Ages ranged from 35 to 50, incomes from zero to $680,000. What united them? They all buy casual clothing and have strong opinions about what justifies paying more for it.
Comfort is the Gating Criterion
I asked participants how important fabric softness and comfort is compared to style, price, and brand when shopping for casual clothing.
The answer was unanimous: comfort comes first. But "comfort" means more than softness.
Jeremy from Savannah explained: "Softness matters, but only if it lasts. I have bought plenty of shirts that felt amazing in the store and turned into sandpaper after three washes. Real comfort is breathability, fit that does not restrict movement, and zero irritation points like scratchy tags."
The comfort hierarchy that emerged:
Breathability and temperature regulation ranked highest
Fit especially not too tight or too short
Durability meaning comfort that survives washing
Absence of irritation no scratchy tags, no rough seams
Initial softness ranked lower, as a tiebreaker not primary factor
Key insight: "Absurdly soft" messaging is a weak lead. Consumers are more interested in durable comfort, breathability, and fit.
Do Sustainability Claims Actually Move the Needle?
I showed participants Marine Layer's positioning: they use absurdly soft fabrics and have saved 650,000 lbs of clothes from landfills through their recycling programme. Does that influence purchase decisions?
The response was sceptical, but not dismissive.
Brandon from North Carolina captured the sentiment: "650,000 pounds sounds impressive until you think about it. Over what timeframe? What percentage of their production? Without context, big numbers are just marketing."
What participants wanted to believe sustainability claims:
Named recycling partners with third-party audits
Timeframes and denominators ("650,000 lbs since 2018 across 47 stores" means something)
Fabric specifications like GSM weight, blend percentages
Durability data because "if it pills after five washes, your sustainability story falls apart"
Key insight: Sustainability messaging acts as a tiebreaker, not a primary purchase driver. It requires proof to be credible.
What Justifies $60 for a T-Shirt?
I asked the hardest question: what would make you willing to pay $60 or more for a casual t-shirt or hoodie?
Hoodies got more permission than t-shirts. And the justification framework was surprisingly consistent.
Derrick from Los Angeles explained the math: "I calculate cost-per-wear. A $20 shirt I wear 10 times costs $2 per wear. A $60 shirt I wear 100 times costs 60 cents per wear. Show me the durability data, and I will consider the premium."
What justified premium pricing:
Multi-season utility especially for hoodies that function as outerwear
Fabric weight and construction details (GSM, reinforced seams)
Durability guarantees like 90-day comfort guarantees or 1-year warranties
Wash-test evidence showing pilling, shrinkage, and colour retention
Key insight: Premium pricing requires cost-per-wear math. Consumers justify higher prices through longevity and proven durability.
What This Means for Sustainable Apparel Brands
Lead with durability, not softness. "Still soft after 100 washes" builds trust.
Show the sustainability receipts. Name your recycling partners, publish audit reports.
Position hoodies as premium, t-shirts as value. $60 hoodies get more permission than $60 tees.
Publish wash-test data. Pill tests, shrink percentages, colour fastness.
The Bottom Line
The sustainable fashion opportunity is real, but the messaging is broken. Consumers do not reject sustainability. They reject unverifiable claims. The brands that win will be the ones that show receipts, lead with durability, and earn premium pricing through proven longevity.
Want to test your own apparel positioning? Ditto lets you run studies like this in hours, not weeks. Book a demo at askditto.io.
What the Research Revealed
We asked real consumers to share their thoughts. Here is what they told us:
How important is fabric softness compared to other factors?
Jeremy Rodriguez, 50, Project Coordinator, Savannah, GA:
Softness matters, but only if it lasts. Real comfort is breathability, fit that does not restrict movement, and zero irritation points.
Kevin Coulter, 42, Maintenance Technician, Rural, OH:
Working in maintenance, comfort means durability. A soft shirt that rips the first time I brush against something is useless.
Does sustainability messaging influence your purchase decision?
Brandon Swindler, 44, Project Manager, Rural, NC:
650,000 pounds sounds impressive until you think about it. Over what timeframe? What percentage of their production? Without context, big numbers are just marketing.
Derrick Puller, 45, Field Service Technician, Los Angeles, CA:
I want to believe it, but I have been burned. I need proof. Wash tests showing how the fabric holds up. Named recycling partners I can look up.
What would make you pay $60 or more for a casual item?
Derrick Puller, 45, Field Service Technician, Los Angeles, CA:
Cost-per-wear is my formula. A $60 shirt I wear 100 times is 60 cents per wear. Show me the durability data proving it will last that long.
Michael Greeson, 44, Portfolio Manager, Rural, TX:
I can afford expensive clothes but I still need justification. A $60 hoodie I wear for three years? Fine. A $60 t-shirt that does the same job as a $15 one? No.