Nevada's 2026 gubernatorial race is shaping up to be one of the most competitive in the country. Governor Joe Lombardo, a Republican and former Las Vegas sheriff, faces Attorney General Aaron Ford, the Democratic challenger. I wanted to know what actual Nevada voters think about both candidates and what issues will decide their votes.
So I ran a study with six Nevada voters from Las Vegas, Reno, Enterprise, and rural areas. The verdict? Voters want receipts, not pressers. And they are deeply skeptical of both candidates.
The Participants
Six participants representing the diversity of Nevada: a logistics coordinator in Las Vegas earning six figures, a health informatics specialist in Enterprise, a stay-at-home mother of three in rural Nevada (uninsured, mortgage-free), a stay-at-home caregiver and Filipino permanent resident in Enterprise, a risk operations manager in Reno (non-citizen, long-term resident), and a 58-year-old disabled veteran and community volunteer in Las Vegas. Ages ranged from 29 to 58.
What united them? Every single one demanded specifics, dashboards, and accountability. The phrase "show me the receipts" appeared in nearly every response.
The Issues That Will Decide 2026
When I asked participants what issues would most influence their vote, three themes dominated:
Water and climate resilience - Lake Mead levels, Colorado River negotiations, turf removal, and grid reliability during 116-degree summers
Healthcare access and costs - Medicaid stability, staffing shortages, network adequacy, and the maze of coverage for everyone from uninsured rural families to VA-juggling veterans
Public safety with accountability - competent policing, body cams, independent reviews, and real consequences when force is misused
Derek from Enterprise summed up the healthcare angle: "I work hospital IT. I watch order sets break at 2 a.m. while nurses run on fumes. If staffing keeps bleeding and ED boarding gets worse, my parents in Henderson pay the price."
Robert, the veteran in Las Vegas, was blunt about water: "We live in a desert, not a brochure. I xeriscaped and watch every gallon. If a candidate cannot show clear conservation plus realistic build limits, I am out."
Key insight: Nevada voters see these issues as existential, not abstract. Water, heat, healthcare access - these directly determine whether their daily lives are manageable.
The Candidates: Lombardo vs. Ford
I asked participants for their impressions of both candidates. The responses reveal a deeply skeptical electorate:
Joe Lombardo (R) - Incumbent
Strengths: "Steady, law-and-order operator." "Calm, no-drama posture." "Feels friendly to business and permitting speed."
Weaknesses: "Too cozy with developers." "Stadium subsidy stuff smells." "Education outcomes are still weak." "If his public safety stance is just tougher penalties without data, I am out."
Natasha from Las Vegas: "My hang-ups: a reflex to veto or posture on culture stuff, and I still do not see a clear, measurable plan on schools that survives a tough budget cycle."
Aaron Ford (D) - Challenger
Strengths: "Sharp lawyer, thoughtful on consumer protection." "Clear on reproductive rights." "Less likely to rubber-stamp corporate giveaways."
Weaknesses: "Lawyer fog." "Crime posture feels soft around the edges." "Can he run the executive with a hospitality lens, not a courtroom lens?"
David from Reno: "I worry he will default to spending first, metrics later, and layer more compliance sludge onto small businesses. If his plan sounds like Sacramento-lite, hard pass."
Key insight: Neither candidate has locked down these voters. Both have trust deficits that could be fatal in a close race. The winner will be whoever can demonstrate operational competence with receipts.
What AG Ford Should Focus On
Ford has built his brand on consumer protection - opioid settlements, housing costs, prescription drug prices. I asked participants if this focus resonated and what they wanted him to address more directly.
The consensus: the focus is right, but the follow-through feels surface-level.
Junk fees and drip pricing - resort fees, rental add-ons, car dealer pack fees, HOA fine mills, and predatory towing
PBM games and pharmacy pricing - "Stop the spread-pricing and rebate shell games. Force clear pricing at the counter."
Data privacy and breach enforcement - health apps selling data, sloppy vendors, breach notices that a normal person can read
Catalytic converter theft and retail theft rings - "Hit the buyers, not just the runners. Track the scrap pipeline."
Use-of-force transparency - "After Minneapolis, I want clean, fast info when force gets used here. No spin. Just the tape."
Derek demanded a dashboard: "If he did even half of that with receipts and a quarterly public report, I would say salamat and shut up. Until then, it feels like headlines without the screws tightened."
Key insight: Ford's consumer protection portfolio is strong, but voters want to see outcomes, not press conferences. A public dashboard tracking opioid settlement spending, cases filed, and consumer price impacts would go far.
What Voters Need to See to Decide
The final verdict from these Nevada voters: neither candidate has earned their vote yet. Here is what would move them:
Specific, measurable targets - "Year-over-year spending growth cap, rainy day fund policy, and a veto promise on any tax or fee hikes without a sunset and measurable ROI."
Public dashboards - "Quarterly updates with county-level data. Where did the opioid money go? What cases were filed? What happened to overdose deaths?"
Key appointments named - "Who runs HHS, DPS, Education, and IT. Names, resumes, and conflict-of-interest disclosures."
Water math that adds up - "Hard targets - per-capita cuts, turf removal dollars, Colorado River posture, growth tied to supply."
Education with numbers - "3-year targets for 3rd grade reading and algebra proficiency. If you want school choice, show guardrails and transparent outcomes."
David from Reno concluded: "I cannot vote, but I still have a mortgage, a kid in school, and skin in the game. If either of them wants my support in the neighborhood or at the soccer sidelines, they need to stop talking in circles and hand over the dashboards."
What This Means for Both Campaigns
If you are advising either campaign in Nevada, here is what this research reveals:
Trust is not assumed. These voters have watched too many officials say one thing and do another. After Minneapolis, their tolerance for spin is at zero.
Water is existential. Any candidate who hand-waves on Colorado River negotiations or growth limits is out.
Healthcare access matters more than coverage debates. Voters care about whether they can actually see a doctor, get a prescription filled at a fair price, and not get ambushed by bills.
Rural voters feel forgotten. "Clark and Washoe are not the whole map" was a direct quote. Rural clinics, EMS response times, broadband that actually works - these are vote-deciders.
Dashboards beat slogans. Every single participant asked for public tracking of promises, outcomes, and spending. Whoever builds that infrastructure wins the trust game.
The Bottom Line
Nevada's 2026 gubernatorial race will be decided by voters who want boring competence over flashy promises. Both Lombardo and Ford have paths to victory, but neither has closed the deal.
As Natasha from Las Vegas put it: "If one of them shows me tight metrics, steady leadership, and less drama, that is my vote. I have zero patience for vibes-only campaigns."
Want to understand what your voters actually think? Ditto lets you run studies like this in hours, not weeks. Book a demo at askditto.io.